The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, including attendant care benefits, physiotherapy, a service dog, assistive devices, and an attendant care assessment.
The respondent denied the benefits based on its independent medical examinations.
The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet her burden of proof to establish entitlement to the attendant care benefits, as she did not prove the expenses were incurred and the respondent's occupational therapy assessment was preferred.
The Tribunal also found that the disputed treatment plans were not reasonable and necessary.
The claims for an award for unreasonably withheld payments and interest were dismissed.
