The applicant father brought an urgent motion to oppose the respondent mother's relocation with their children from Ottawa to Kingston.
The respondent brought a cross-motion to remain in Kingston.
The court applied the framework for mobility rights and considered the best interests of the children.
Finding that the applicant had previously consented to the move via text message and that the respondent had established a new home and employment in Kingston, the court permitted the respondent to remain in Kingston on a temporary basis and ordered a specified access schedule for the applicant.
