The respondent father brought a motion seeking permission to travel to Jamaica with his six-year-old son.
The applicant mother opposed, citing concerns about abduction risk, safety, and the child's stated preference.
The court, applying the "best interests of the child" principle under the Children’s Law Reform Act, found insufficient evidence to support the mother's fears regarding abduction or safety.
The motion was granted, allowing the father to travel with the child, and the mother's consent was dispensed with.
The applicant was also ordered to pay costs to the respondent.
