The case was a trial concerning parenting and child support for the parties' five-year-old daughter.
The applicant mother sought final orders for primary residence, sole decision-making authority, and retroactive child support.
The respondent father sought primary residence with him, sole decision-making (with an exception for religion), shared parenting time, and no ongoing or retroactive child support.
The court found it was in the child's best interests to remain in the mother's primary care with the mother having sole decision-making authority.
The court imputed the father's income due to inadequate financial disclosure and ordered retroactive child support and ongoing support, along with a specific parenting time schedule.