1 total
The court ordered no costs for a successful motion because the moving party required an indulgence and caused delay.
This endorsement addresses the costs of a motion where the moving party was successful.
Despite the moving party's success on the underlying motion, the court declined to award costs to any party.
This decision was based on the moving party receiving an indulgence and causing a further attendance due to insufficient time scheduling, and the responding parties' unsuccessful opposition.
The court found that a fair disposition was to award no costs.
