The applicant sought judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) decision denying his refugee claim.
The RAD upheld the Refugee Protection Division's finding that the applicant was not credible, largely due to memory gaps.
The Federal Court found the RAD's decision unreasonable because it accepted the applicant's diagnosis of severe PTSD but failed to consider whether the trauma-related memory issues accounted for the inconsistencies in his testimony.
The application for judicial review was granted and the matter remitted for redetermination.
