The husband brought a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the wife's claims to set aside their separation agreement and for spousal support and equalization.
The wife alleged the husband failed to provide accurate financial disclosure regarding the value of his business, and that the agreement was signed under duress and without independent legal advice.
The court granted the summary judgment motion, finding no genuine issue for trial.
The court held that the wife, a lawyer who had access to the husband's financial information, chose not to investigate the values provided and could not now rely on alleged non-disclosure to set aside the agreement.
The court also found no evidence of duress or unconscionability, and upheld the spousal support release under the Miglin framework.
