The appellant appealed a motion judge's order varying spousal support due to the respondent's imminent retirement and dismissing her motion for retroactive adjustment.
The motion judge found a material change in circumstances based on the appellant's increased medical expenses and the respondent's retirement, ordering support to terminate after a two-year transitional period.
The Court of Appeal found no reversible error in the motion judge's analysis of the compensatory support termination or the denial of retroactive support, noting the deferential standard of review for support orders.
The appeal was dismissed.