The defendants sought an urgent 90-day stay of a writ of possession obtained by the plaintiffs over their home, along with a notice to vacate.
They challenged fees included in the plaintiffs' mortgage discharge statement, arguing they violated the Interest Act.
The defendants wished to return to the home to refinance or sell it within the stay period.
The court granted the 90-day stay with conditions, finding no prejudice to the plaintiffs and noting that the stay would allow the defendants to challenge the disputed fees.
The plaintiffs were ordered to pay the defendants' costs.
