The accused was charged with uttering threats, criminal harassment, and firearms offences arising from arguments with his then intimate partner.
The Crown's case relied entirely on the complainant's testimony.
The court found the accused to be a credible and reliable witness whose evidence raised a reasonable doubt.
Conversely, the court found the complainant was not credible, noting she lied under oath about wanting to meet the accused after his arrest, swore a misleading affidavit in family proceedings, and gave evidence inconsistent with her 911 call.
The accused was acquitted on all counts.
