The respondent sought costs after successfully defending a motion brought by the applicant and succeeding on a cross-motion for security for costs.
The applicant argued that no costs should be awarded due to her impecuniosity and because she acted in the best interests of the child.
The court found that the applicant had not taken a realistic or reasonable position and that her impecuniosity did not grant her unrestricted access to the courts.
The court awarded costs to the respondent in the amount of $8,754.40, payable within 60 days.
