Tracy Pratt

The moving party, a mining exploration company, sought leave to appeal an interlocutory injunction that restrained it from engaging in mineral exploration activities on lands subject to asserted treaty and Aboriginal rights of the responding First Nation.

The motion judge had granted the injunction based on the Crown's failure to consult and accommodate, finding that the operational aspects of the duty to consult had been delegated to the mining company.

The Divisional Court granted leave to appeal, finding good reason to doubt the correctness of the motion judge's decision that the company had a delegated duty to consult and that an injunction could be issued against a third party based on the Crown's failure to consult.

Staff of the Ontario Securities Commission alleged that the respondent, a lawyer and business consultant, engaged in unregistered trading and advising, illegal distributions, and made misleading representations regarding securities of Saxton Investments Ltd. and Sussex International Ltd. The respondent had attended meetings and provided updates on Cuban business operations to investors and salespeople.

The Commission found that the respondent's conduct was informational rather than promotional, and did not amount to acts in furtherance of a trade or advising.

The Commission also found insufficient evidence that the respondent knew the operations were running at a loss when he provided updates, or that he engaged in illegal distributions.

All allegations were dismissed.