The applicant sought reconsideration of a Licence Appeal Tribunal decision that denied his claim for interest and a special award under Regulation 664 regarding his medical marijuana expenses.
The applicant argued the Tribunal made procedural and factual errors, including proceeding in writing and misinterpreting correspondence.
The Associate Chair found no significant errors of law, fact, or procedure in the original decision, confirming that the insurer's request for a prescribing doctor's statement was reasonable and that payment was made within the required timeframe.
The request for reconsideration was denied.
