Both the applicant and the respondent sought reconsideration of a decision finding that the respondent discriminated against the applicant based on his place of origin when it terminated his employment.
The applicant sought to introduce new evidence and claim higher damages, while the respondent argued the adjudicator applied the incorrect legal test, breached procedural fairness, and exhibited a reasonable apprehension of bias.
The Tribunal dismissed both requests, finding neither party established the criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5.
