The mother brought a motion to determine the school enrollment of the parties' four-year-old child.
The mother sought enrollment in a French Immersion program, while the father, who had unilaterally enrolled the child in an English program contrary to a prior order requiring joint decision-making, sought to maintain the English enrollment.
The court found that it was in the child's best interests to have the opportunity to master French, noting the child's French-Canadian heritage and the benefits of bilingualism.
The court ordered the child to be enrolled in the French Immersion school and directed that both parents, the father's grandmother, and the mother's partner be listed as emergency contacts.
