This case involves two motions for temporary relief in a family law dispute concerning parenting time, decision-making responsibility, and child support for an 11-year-old child.
The mother sought sole decision-making, exclusive residence, temporary suspension of the father's parenting time, and child support.
The father sought primary care, sole decision-making, and shared parenting.
The court considered the child's views and preferences, as reported by the Children's Lawyer, and the child's emotional well-being.
The court granted the mother sole decision-making, primary residence, and child support, but ordered limited parenting time for the father instead of a full suspension, and denied the mother's request for a restraining order.
The court rejected the father's claims that the mother coached the child or engineered the crisis.