The applicant, a condominium owner, alleged discrimination on the basis of creed and reprisal by the respondent condominium corporation.
The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.
The applicant alleged that the respondent reprised against her for a previous human rights application by refusing to let her speak at board meetings and deleting her posts from the condominium website.
The Tribunal found no evidence linking the respondent's actions to a Code ground or an intention to reprise, noting the respondent provided legitimate, non-Code reasons for its actions.
The application was dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.