The court considered dismissing the action brought by the plaintiff T.D.B.L. under Rule 2.1 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, on the grounds that it was frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of process.
The claim, advanced by T.D.B.L.'s son (who is not a lawyer), alleged illegal removal of her child under the Child and Family Services Act and constitutional rights violations.
The court found T.D.B.L.'s claim could not succeed, as challenges to child custody orders or care agreements cannot be made in a civil proceeding, and there was no plausible basis for constitutional rights breaches.
The court also noted T.D.B.L. did not appear to be actively participating or properly represented.
Consequently, T.D.B.L.'s action was dismissed without costs.
