The applicant brought an uncontested motion to change a 1995 final order to terminate his spousal support obligation.
The original order provided for a review when the respondent turned 65.
The applicant, now 65, experienced a decrease in income due to the loss of a pension supplement and depletion of his assets, resulting in a monthly deficit.
The court applied the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines and the principles from Moge and Bracklow, finding that the applicant had paid support well above the high range for 17 years.
The court terminated the spousal support obligation and ordered the respondent to reimburse any overpayments.
