The appellant appealed a trial decision regarding spousal support, arguing the trial judge erred in applying the rule against double recovery, imputing income, and weighing medical evidence.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding the trial judge properly applied the Boston principle in light of the parties' separation agreement and the appellant's reckless depletion of assets.
The court also upheld the imputation of $5,000 in annual income due to the appellant's poor financial decisions and found no error in the trial judge's treatment of the medical evidence.
