The father brought a motion to change a child support order, seeking to reduce table support for his adult daughter who was attending university away from home for eight months of the year, and to fix his contribution to her section 7 expenses.
The mother opposed, arguing that full table support should continue as she maintained a home for the daughter's visits and study breaks, and sought an increase in support based on the father's higher income.
The court dismissed the father's request to reduce table support, finding the table approach was not inappropriate given the family's pre-separation lifestyle and the mother's ongoing household expenses.
The court increased the table support to reflect the father's current income and apportioned the section 7 expenses 67% to the father and 33% to the mother.
