The accused was convicted of second degree murder after the trial judge allowed the Crown to reopen its case to call a new witness after the defence had closed its case.
The trial judge also allowed the Crown to cross-examine the accused on her bad character, including her sexual relationship with one of the co-accused and the presence of stolen property in her house.
The Court of Appeal upheld the conviction.
The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal and directed a new trial, holding that the trial judge erred in allowing the Crown to reopen its case at the third stage of the trial, as it prejudiced the accused's right to make full answer and defence.
The Court found that the character evidence was properly admitted as it was relevant to significant issues in the case.
