Motion to strike granted as inmate's application for judicial review was premature and out of time.
The respondent moved to strike the applicant inmate's application for declaratory relief regarding the cancellation of an unescorted temporary absence by an institutional warden.
The court held that the proceeding was an application for judicial review disguised as a request for declaratory relief.
The application was filed beyond the 30-day time limit without a motion for an extension, and was premature because the applicant had not exhausted the internal grievance procedures under the Corrections and Conditional Release Act.
The motion to strike was granted and the application was dismissed.
