The defendant, a helper trapper, was charged with using a non-certified trap (Woodstream Oneida Victor Conibear 120) for trapping pine marten, contrary to section 18(1)(a) of Regulation 667/98 under the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act.
The defendant argued that responsibility for compliance with the regulation rested solely with the head trapper under section 10(2) of the regulation.
The court rejected this argument, finding that helper trappers are independently required to comply with all trapping regulations, including trap certification requirements.
The court convicted the defendant of the offence as a strict liability matter in a public welfare statute, noting the defendant presented no evidence of due diligence.