The appellant appealed a trial judgment that largely denied his motion to change child and spousal support and ordered him to pay significant arrears.
He argued the trial judge erred by denying an adjournment to retain counsel, imputing income without sufficient evidence, and ordering him to pay 100 percent of horse-related section 7 expenses.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the trial judge properly exercised his discretion in refusing the adjournment, had a sufficient basis to impute income due to the appellant's failure to provide financial information, and correctly treated the horse-related expenses as section 7 expenses.
