The applicant sought an order of mandamus to compel the Registrar of Motor Vehicles to reinstate his driver's licence following a suspension for impaired driving.
He argued that the six-month follow-up interview required by the Remedial Measures Program was not authorized by law.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding that a purposive interpretation of the Highway Traffic Act and its regulations authorized the three-component program, including the follow-up interview.
Furthermore, the application was moot as the applicant's licence had expired and been suspended for other infractions.
