The appellants requested an adjournment of their appeal in a mortgage enforcement action, citing their representative's compromised vision due to a medical issue.
The court reviewed the history of the proceeding, noting a pattern of delay and previous adjournments.
Finding the medical evidence insufficient and the request to be a further attempt to delay enforcement, the court denied the adjournment and ordered the appeal to proceed on the scheduled date, with provisions for written submissions if the appellants failed to appear.
