The applicant brought a motion seeking interim custody, child support, spousal support, exclusive possession of the matrimonial home, and financial disclosure.
The respondent sought expanded parenting time with the child of the marriage.
The court held that conflicting evidence prevented a finding on an interim basis that the respondent stood in loco parentis to the applicant’s two older children from a prior relationship.
The court imputed income of $100,000 to the respondent due to inadequate financial disclosure and lifestyle evidence, and ordered interim child and spousal support retroactive to the date of separation.
Interim parenting arrangements maximizing the child’s contact with both parents were established, and orders for disclosure, asset preservation, and exclusive possession of the matrimonial home were granted.
