The appellant appealed a decision of the Deputy Director of Titles under the Boundaries Act confirming the location of a boundary between her property and the respondents' property.
The Deputy Director had rejected the boundary lines proposed by both parties' expert surveyors, instead relying on a 1970 survey and the historical location of a snake rail fence.
The Divisional Court determined the standard of review was reasonableness and found that the Deputy Director's decision was supported by the evidence.
The appeal was dismissed.
