The plaintiff commenced a civil action alleging lack of procedural fairness by a regulatory body and seeking compensatory damages.
The court reviewed the statement of claim and written submissions and found the action to be frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process.
The court held that the allegations against the regulatory body concerned matters of public law properly challenged through judicial review rather than civil damages proceedings.
Claims against the industry association were also found to be statute-barred and not actionable.
The action was dismissed under Rule 2.1.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
