The respondent brought a motion seeking unsupervised or supervised parenting time with the parties' two children.
The applicant opposed unsupervised access and sought supervised access through professional services, also bringing a cross-motion to impute income to the respondent for child support purposes.
The court, considering allegations of family violence and the children's best interests, ordered temporary supervised parenting time for the respondent by his uncle, finding this a sufficient and proportionate response to safety concerns.
The court dismissed the applicant's cross-motion to impute income, concluding that the respondent was not intentionally underemployed or unemployed given his termination due to criminal charges and his efforts to start a new business.
