Stephen E. Sloan

The applicant sought income replacement benefits (IRBs) following a motor vehicle accident.

The Tribunal found that while the applicant established a substantial inability to perform the essential tasks of her employment for the pre-104 week period, the respondent was not liable to pay the IRBs because the applicant failed to provide reasonably required financial documentation to calculate the quantum.

The applicant's claim for post-104 week IRBs was barred due to her failure to attend a reasonably necessary vocational assessment without a reasonable explanation.

Claims for an award and interest were dismissed.

The applicant sought non-earner benefits and a treatment plan for psychological and neuropsychological assessments following a motor vehicle accident.

The respondent denied the benefits, arguing the applicant's limitations were due to pre-existing conditions, including multiple sclerosis, and that he did not suffer a complete inability to carry on a normal life.

The Tribunal found the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence of his pre-accident activities or objective medical evidence to refute the respondent's insurer's examinations.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding the applicant was not entitled to the non-earner benefits, the treatment plan, interest, or an award for unreasonable delay.