This trial concerned parenting and child support arrangements for the parties' four-year-old child.
The mother sought primary residence and sole decision-making, and child support.
The father sought primary residence and sole decision-making, and no child support.
The court found it in the child's best interests to be in the primary care of the father with sole decision-making responsibility, citing the mother's emotional fragility, contempt for the father, unwillingness to cooperate, and attempts to alienate the child from the father.
The court also imputed income to the father for retroactive child support from the date of separation but terminated ongoing child support due to the father having primary residence and not seeking support from the mother.
