The applicant employer sought judicial review of a Grievance Settlement Board decision that voided a four-day suspension imposed on a grievor.
The Board had found that the employer breached the collective agreement by failing to advise the grievor of his right to union representation during a police interview at which a supervisor was present.
The Divisional Court held that the appropriate standard of review was patent unreasonableness.
Finding that the Board's interpretation of the collective agreement and its application of the automatic voiding remedy were not patently unreasonable, the Court dismissed the application for judicial review.
