The applicant father brought a motion for increased parenting time with the parties' four-year-old child.
The respondent mother opposed the extent of the proposed increase, arguing that mid-week overnight access would be disruptive.
The court applied the best interests of the child factors under the Divorce Act and found that a modest increase in overnight parenting time, including mid-week overnights, was appropriate given the parents' proximity, flexible work schedules, and the child's need for maximum contact with both parents.
The father was awarded costs of $5,000.
