The appellant, Phillip Rodd, appealed a decision ordering the forfeiture of his firearms and a three-year weapons prohibition under s. 117.05(4) of the Criminal Code.
The appeal challenged the application judge’s findings on the basis of misapprehension of evidence, reliance on hearsay, and failure to consider the appellant’s circumstances.
The Superior Court of Justice found that the application judge properly considered all evidence, including hearsay, and applied the correct legal test.
The appeal was dismissed.
