3 total
The court dismissed a surety's motion for summary judgment on a limitation period defence due to complex factual disputes regarding subcontractor default.
Chartis Insurance Company of Canada moved for partial summary judgment to dismiss a claim by Walsh Construction/Bondfield Partnership for payment on a performance bond, arguing the action was statute-barred.
The court found that determining whether the claim was statute-barred required extensive factual findings regarding the subcontractor's actual default, proper notice, and cure of defaults, which constituted genuine issues requiring a trial.
The motion was dismissed due to the complexity of the factual matrix and the risk of inconsistent findings with related construction lien actions involving other parties.
Successful plaintiff awarded $17,000 in partial indemnity costs, matching the defendant's own incurred costs.
Following a successful motion, the plaintiff sought partial indemnity costs of $17,000.
The defendant argued the amount was excessive and proposed $6,000.
The court found the requested amount fair and reasonable, noting it was almost identical to the partial indemnity costs incurred by the defendant itself.
Costs were fixed at $17,000.
The court referred a performance bond dispute to the Master managing related construction lien actions to avoid a multiplicity of proceedings.
The plaintiff, Walsh Construction/Bondfield Partnership, brought a motion to refer its proceeding against Chartis Insurance Company of Canada to Master Albert, who was already hearing related construction lien matters concerning the same project.
The court considered whether the litigation between the general contractor and the performance bond issuer should be heard by the same Master to avoid a multiplicity of proceedings and inconsistent findings.
The motion was granted, finding significant overlap in factual and legal issues and no undue prejudice to the defendant.
