Dr. Rajkumar was charged with impaired driving.
The defence alleged multiple Charter breaches (s. 8, 9, 10(b)) related to the breath demand immediacy, the right to counsel, and unreasonable detention ("overholding").
The court found that the breath screening demand was not immediate, breaching s. 8 and s. 10(b), and that the right to counsel was not properly facilitated, breaching s. 10(b).
The Crown conceded a s. 9 breach for overholding.
Applying the R. v. Grant test, the court found the cumulative breaches serious and their impact significant, outweighing society's interest in adjudication on the merits.
The breath testing results were excluded from evidence, leading to an acquittal.