The plaintiff sought an order declaring the self-represented defendant a trespasser and requiring her to deliver vacant possession of a rental property.
The defendant had been living rent-free in the property since 2003 after vacating her mortgaged home due to severe structural and mold issues.
The parties disputed the terms of the oral agreement governing her occupancy of the rental property.
Finding that the material facts were in dispute, the court directed a trial of the issue pursuant to Rule 38.10 and ordered a teleconference to discuss joining the matter with the defendant's related ongoing actions.
