The plaintiffs and defendants brought competing motions in an underlying real estate dispute regarding mould.
The plaintiffs sought to strike the defendants' statement of defence, arguing the defendants breached a prior order requiring them to seek leave before bringing further motions.
The defendants moved to set aside a notice of garnishment, which the court treated as a request to stay enforcement pending various applications for leave to appeal.
The court dismissed the plaintiffs' motion, finding the prior order did not apply to motions for leave to appeal.
The court also dismissed the defendants' motion, finding they failed to establish a serious issue to be tried or irreparable harm to justify a stay of enforcement.
