The appellant appealed a Small Claims Court order dismissing her motion to set aside a default judgment.
The underlying claim alleged she used her position at a bank to induce the plaintiff into a $30,000 fraudulent investment.
The Divisional Court upheld the Deputy Judge's finding that the appellant failed to present a meritorious defence, as her evidence merely asserted the transaction was with her husband and did not address the specific allegations of inducement pleaded against her.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
