The applicant father brought a motion for temporary custody, primary residence, increased parenting time, and support.
The respondent mother brought a cross-motion for retroactive and ongoing support, and an irrevocable life insurance beneficiary designation.
The court declined to make a temporary custody order or to impute income to either party due to conflicting and insufficient evidence, reserving those issues for trial.
The court incrementally increased the father's parenting time to respect the maximum contact principle and ordered the father to pay temporary child and spousal support based on the parties' current actual incomes.
