The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, including an income replacement benefit and various medical and rehabilitation benefits.
The respondent denied the benefits, arguing the applicant did not suffer a substantial inability to perform the essential tasks of her employment and that her injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to prove she suffered a substantial inability to work, noting she continued to work after the accident.
Furthermore, the Tribunal held that the applicant did not establish a diagnosis of chronic pain that would remove her from the MIG.
The application was dismissed.
