The applicant sought to add a personal respondent to her human rights application alleging sexual harassment.
The proposed respondent had filed a proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, which typically stays proceedings.
However, because the applicant confirmed she would only seek non-monetary remedies against him (such as human rights training), she was no longer considered a creditor with a claim provable in bankruptcy.
The Tribunal granted the request to add the personal respondent.
