The moving party father sought a retroactive finding that he overpaid child support from 2010 to 2016 and an order for reimbursement of $39,975, arguing the adult children were no longer dependants.
The responding party mother opposed, citing delay and lack of notice, and argued the funds were used for the children.
The court dismissed the motion, finding that while the children's entitlement had terminated, the father's delay, his historical underpayment of support based on his actual income, and the mother's use of the funds for the children weighed against ordering reimbursement.