The appellant challenged trial findings concerning undue influence, the validity of gifts, and whether a 1988 will had been revoked.
The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge's decision turned largely on credibility findings, to which deference was owed.
The court found clear evidence raising a presumption of undue influence, which the appellant failed to rebut, and rejected the argument that the facts supported a presumption that the will had been revoked.
The appeal was dismissed with costs to the respondents.
