The plaintiff brought a motion seeking three orders: an affidavit of documents from the individual defendant, an adjournment concerning the corporate defendants, and copies of documents subject to a prior request.
The court denied the first two requests, deeming the affidavit premature and lacking jurisdiction for the adjournment given the corporate defendants' default status.
However, the court granted the request for document copies, emphasizing the importance of common sense and the liberal construction of the Rules of Civil Procedure over strict adherence to Rule 30.04(3) regarding document inspection location.
No costs were awarded due to divided success.
