The applicant mother brought a motion to strike the respondent father's pleadings on financial issues due to his pervasive failure to comply with financial disclosure orders and the Family Law Rules.
The mother also sought the appointment of a new section 30 assessor and an order for the child's therapy.
The court struck the father's Answer regarding all financial and property claims, allowing the mother to proceed to an uncontested trial on those issues, though the father was permitted to continue participating on parenting issues.
The court also appointed the proposed section 30 assessor and ordered therapy for the child, rejecting the father's objections which were based solely on the race of the professionals.
