The applicant requested a reconsideration of a motion order that dismissed his application for accident benefits as an abuse of process.
The dismissal followed the applicant's repeated failure to complete a psychological insurer's examination over three years, including refusing to sign consent forms and threatening assessors.
The Vice Chair found no error of law or jurisdiction in the original dismissal, rejecting arguments of res judicata, assessor bias, and adjudicator bias.
The request for reconsideration was dismissed, and the respondent's request for costs was denied.
