This appeal arose from the appellants' default under several mortgages and guarantees.
The appellants challenged the motion judge's decision to grant interest despite the respondent's concession of charging a criminal interest rate and failing to provide timely discharge statements, and disputed the calculation of amounts owing.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeals, affirming the motion judge's discretionary application of notional severance for the criminal interest rate and upholding the factual findings regarding the amounts advanced.
The court found no reversible error or basis for claims of Charter violations or judicial bias.
